Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to “Theoretical study of frustrated magnetic ordering in La1/3Ca2/3MnO3: The role of charge-orbital ordering” [J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 513 (2020) 167248] (Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials (2020) 513, (S0304885320303437), (10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167248))
AU - Gonchar, L. E.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The author regrets an unintentional mistake in “Effect of external magnetic field” subsection of a recently published article. This mistake is concerned Fig. 6 horizontal axis labels and further discussion about it. Notwithstanding these corrections, all the other equations and results of the paper are correct as originally presented. The corrections are as follows: The estimation of the spin-flop field is Hsf = 27 T. The inflection point of the curve corresponds to a partial (for one kind of stripe) spin-flop transition at H = 27 T. The determinant contribution to the dependence of Fig. 6(c) gives the magnetization component, which is parallel to the field direction at H = 0 T. The spin-flop field is mainly dependent upon SIA and AFM SE interactions, and less dependent upon FM SE parameter. It is supposed to be stronger than the same field in half-doped manganites (Hsf ∼ 5 T [2]) and in pure manganite (Hsf ∼ 19 T [1])1. That can be explained by increase in the number of AFM pairs of manganese ions in crystal, despite decrease of the mean AFM-type SE interaction value in the pair and mean SIA value per magnetic ion with the increase of doping level comparing with pure and half-doped CO manganites. The author would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. © 2023 Elsevier B.V.
AB - The author regrets an unintentional mistake in “Effect of external magnetic field” subsection of a recently published article. This mistake is concerned Fig. 6 horizontal axis labels and further discussion about it. Notwithstanding these corrections, all the other equations and results of the paper are correct as originally presented. The corrections are as follows: The estimation of the spin-flop field is Hsf = 27 T. The inflection point of the curve corresponds to a partial (for one kind of stripe) spin-flop transition at H = 27 T. The determinant contribution to the dependence of Fig. 6(c) gives the magnetization component, which is parallel to the field direction at H = 0 T. The spin-flop field is mainly dependent upon SIA and AFM SE interactions, and less dependent upon FM SE parameter. It is supposed to be stronger than the same field in half-doped manganites (Hsf ∼ 5 T [2]) and in pure manganite (Hsf ∼ 19 T [1])1. That can be explained by increase in the number of AFM pairs of manganese ions in crystal, despite decrease of the mean AFM-type SE interaction value in the pair and mean SIA value per magnetic ion with the increase of doping level comparing with pure and half-doped CO manganites. The author would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. © 2023 Elsevier B.V.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=8YFLogxK&scp=85153188747
UR - https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=tsmetrics&SrcApp=tsm_test&DestApp=WOS_CPL&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=000988637500001
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170749
DO - 10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170749
M3 - Comment/debate
VL - 575
JO - Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
JF - Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
SN - 0304-8853
M1 - 170749
ER -
ID: 37832589